If you had a?
Answer:
AH! Thats a hard question!! I would save which ever one is closest to me. The one that has a better chance of surviving.
All children go to heaven, regardless.
i'd throw both of them out of the fire and sacrifice myself.
Perhaps you should only have one child, and hope that you both make it out of the fire.
Nice thinking, but why punish the good one? Save the good one because he/she might grow up to be someone great, like a doctor, and save more lives or help others. You're only hurting the world by saving the bad one because everyone has to put up with him/her.
Ha ha I'm reading some of the dumb responses. No need to overreact ppl! It's just a hypothetical question. Besides, we all know u guys favor the good kid but pretend to love both equally 0;D
You obviously are not a parent, or just a really bad one. In the end, no matter what wrong your children have done, they are still your babies and you love them more than the world. I would save both of them and jump into the fire myself so they both could live.
Your question is ridiculous and your additional details just make it worse.
sick question. if i had ANY child left in a house i wouldnt choose, i'd die first trying to save both.
i would try to save each one of them not one or the other they both deserve life.
i'd save the youngest one first, because he has not had as much time in this world as the other, and then i would run back for the second one.
You should watch the movie "Sophie's Choice" with Meryl Streep. She has to choose if her son or daughter will live.
I don't think anyone can say what they would do because it's not something we can plan.
That would be a horrible thing to happen but I would die trying to save both.
How could you ask such a question? You must not be a parent. It's like asking what child do you love more. A loving parent loves both children equally. (You may have more in common with one child or be closer to one but you love them equally)
i wouldnt choose. i would still love them. i would kill my self if i couldnt save 1 of them. i would leave them, and go in and die with them. i wouldnt be able to choose.
there is alot more to this then choosing what one there would be things like can you yell for one to get out where is the most smoke the most heat is the roof caving in ect.. its not a matter of who the child is or how he behaved its a matter of doing all i could do to save them both even if it meant dying myself...
id try and save both, even if it ment id die, thats how much i love my kids, even when their naughty.
tuff question - i would go for which ever child is closest, and which one is easyest for me to reach, if they where equaly away id go for the best behaved one.
I think in a situation in which lives are in danger, all the crap that made you think a child was 'good' or 'bad' disappears, and all you remember is how much you love them and want the best for them.
And then you strive your hardest to save both. Even if they were on opposite ends of the house, you totally would.
The answers post by the user, for information only, FeelBaby.com does not guarantee the right.