A mad scientist (me), puts you into a position where you have to choose between two options.?
That is all you know. And you have to act.
Yes, that means that you don't know that the woman chose to be there anymore than Koko did. Therefore, I reject any answer that simply assumes she is there of her own accord, because that is unclear.
THIS IS A REVISION OF THE QUESTION.
Answer:
Okay I am going to take a weird/neutral approach to this (leaving my personal views aside) I would CHOOSE to do nothing.
From the little information you provide, I can only assume certain variables:
1 the woman chose to seek out medical treatment for an abortion, therefore why should I intervene. (Hey for all I know, she could be a devote Christian that found out she is carrying the anti-Christ and is wanting to stop the endtimes.)
2 If Koko is being euthanized, it must be for some reason, right? (For all I know Koko could be the carrier of the next plague and if she breathes on people they will die.)
So with both of those unknowns as POSSIBILITIES why do anything??
**Like I said I am leaving my personal views aside and looking at why either of these situations may logically be taking place. I know you said that it is unclear as to the woman being there of her own accord, but via the laws of this country a woman cannot be forced into an abortion, not even if to save her life.
Edit** If there is no reason to be assumed as to why either event is occurring, other than the scientist is "mad" then I would just kill the scientist.
I would stop the abortion. Sorry koko.
Okay, you put me in the position to choose, but I don't have to submit to your press to choose. I choose RESISTANCE! I would not want to kill KOKO or the baby. I act by resistance to your pressure. I fight for both of their liberty, for truth, justice and the American way for freedom! I think of an escape plan and free them both to live happily ever after!
The answers post by the user, for information only, FeelBaby.com does not guarantee the right.