Why parents spank or hit their kids?
Answers: Spanking/swatting/paddeling/ta... ALL hitting and it's ALL abuse! You own NO right to hit ANYONE, more or less someone entrusted to your precision. Gross on so many level. You're a shitty parent if you need to name-calling to get results. Period.
to behonest i ponder its more out of anger although i once smacked my nephews bottom (or as he calls it fanked my butt) b/c he be trying to put a hanger in the electric outlet (after he pulled the kiddie saftey plug out) and i be more afraid of him getting hurt then anything. So if he have a pain connentation beside doing it he would not do it again. My mother has the best point within disciplining children, if you must smack you only smack once, one smack get the point across but 2 smacks is more for yourself out of anger.
You don't even have kids. What's beside you people thinking a swat on the butt is going to emotionally mutilation a kid for life?
You really deliberate you can sit down & have a sound conversation with a three year out-of-date about why they shouldn't run into the street?
Parents spank or hit their kids to instruct them disipline because they think if they a short time ago talk to their kids they won't listen and they won't really swot what's right from wrong.
where the hell r u from? kids necessitate to b hit 4 disciplinary reasons... i abominate these parents on these nanny 911 shows who wont smack their kids... grow some balls
You answered your own put somebody through the mill, you don't have kids and you're childish and idealistic within your views. How around holding judgment until you hold your own toddler and then you can try to aim with him in the region of how his behavior is making mommy unhappy and see how much he care.
Hitting is effective, but NEVER mandatory when it comes to parenting. Some people see it as an confident way out, because it doesn't involve even the simplest psychology.
Until you enjoy kids I suggest you don't judge how others discipline their children. It's none of your business. What does a 3.5 gpa hold to do with anything? Are you suggesting kids who are spanked don't bring back as good of grades as those who aren't?
It's emphatically done out of anger (no its never out of love, thats BS. I was spanked growing up.). You wouldn't spank the kid because they are making you thankful. You spank them because they are irritating the crap out of you and you cant hit them in the obverse or that really is abuse.
I couldn't dream of spanking a child either. And YES, I do own a daughter.
And let me be clear - I am not chitchat about one simple swat on the butt... I am reffering to the "seize out the belt and bend over!" spankings.
I was enormously rarely spanked. But later, I had respect/fear of my parents and at age 34 still do. Kids today surface they are OWED everything and have little or no respect for their parents. My parents are wonderful nation and the fear that I own is disappointing them, not physical fear. I sure want I knew how to instill that surrounded by my children. My 16 year old dialogue to me as if I was one of her "homies". I deduce today people own less mercy and give within a whole lot faster than parents did when I be growing up. There is too much put into material items, too much of the "fast-paced life" for parents to nick time to actually BE a parent.
I'm wondering what your gpa have to do with your parents' discipline style, especially when you can't even spell 'disciplined' properly? Oh, and it's 'asinine', 'it's', and 'too'... if you want to demonstrate your intelligence (something you did spell properly) and proper respect for the coaching your parents paid for, it would behoove you to jump back and re-take that Basic English Grammar course; alternately, you can slow down on the typing and proofread your posts earlier hitting the 'send' tab.
Spanking, when administered properly, can be an effective disciplinary tool when no other method works. Notice the clarifications 'administered properly' and 'when no other method works'. It should never be administered contained by anger or in excess, and adjectives other methods should be tried first, like redirection and timeouts. It's not for everyone; it's immaculately fine that you don't use it when you have children, for the fundamentally reasons you stated.
Thank you for vent what promises to be a very vicious and angry debate!
Its call discipline. there is times to spank and in that is call for time out. kids surrounded by there teens should be grounded they are to infirm to be spanked and should know better.
It's a personal decision. Some general public choose to spank, others not. I was spanked when I did something wrong as a child and I can honestly speak that I respect my mother for it. I didn't understand next, but I realize now that it have made me a better person. Look at adjectives the kids nowadays that smoke and swear and some even physically harm their mothers! They have no discipline whatsoever. The mother say "Please don't do that." Do they listen? No. I have a 3 year infirm daughter and when she gets out of smudge, I won't hesitate to put her over my knees and pop her butt. She is well behave most of the time due to this. She is a sweet, intelligent, normal 3 year antediluvian girl. She replies to my husband and I with, "Yes ma'am" or "Yes, sir". We're schooling her to have manners and to respect us. Believe me, I be spanked when I was growing up and it moved out no emotional deformity whatsoever on me. I agree with the phrase "Spare the rod and spoil the child". Discipline let children know that there are consequences to their engagements. It helps train them right from wrong. You will see if you ever have a 3 year antediluvian and they throw a huge temper tantrum contained by the middle of the grocery store. Simply "asking" a 3 year old to "please, stop it" doesn't work 9 times out of 10. Either road, it's a personal choice and I will continue to use this method because it have proved affective for me and my child.
It's a misunderstand of human nature to reflect on that spanking a kid teaches the ferocity. It takes so much credit away from the smartest living item on earth. Kids can well understand that they attain spanked because they did something wrong and that it's for the purpose of teaching them not to do it again. Parents may variety the mistake of doing it too often, or not effectively plenty, or a range of other mistakes, but if handle correctly there is nought wrong using spanking as a tool in the process of raise a kid. It shouldn't be done all the time, since that, by definition money it's not working. It loses it's value when it's done regularly and it doesn't work if it doesn't hurt. It should be reserved for high crimes and misdemeanors, and not be an adjectives the time event. But again, it is simply not true that it teaches kids bombing, or that violence is the best methodology to solve problems. If that be true, then something like 75% of the population would be violent. I believe here is such a thing as excellent parenting combined near the right personality of a child that might allow for no spanking, but that will the exception, not the rule. In 1948 a study found that the biggest problems contained by school be talking surrounded by class and running in the hallway. A recent study found the biggest problem in conservatory was the potential for homicide. And you deliberate spanking causes horrific behavior? You are exactly wrong, in certainty, it's the LACK of spanking that can lead to disorderly behavior. And I'm not saying spanking is the entire issue here, in that are other issues but this is a basic one that too lots people thought they be smart moving away from, and found the nightmare at the end of the process.
Like other empire have said, you don't own kids yourself. How can you say spanking teach kids violence, when you don't enjoy the slightest bit of experience with it? I be spanked, and I have never be violent.
I be also spanked and it wasn't the only punishment I ever recieved. I hold also been grounded and put within time out. Laughed at all the time outs, because they be so fake to me. So, formerly you talk, acquire to know your facts.
Let people lift their kids the way they want to, and you bring to the fore yours the way you see fit.
That is when and if you even own kids. Until then, your view doesn't matter to closely of parents in this world.
Oh yeah, why be you playing with fire at 13? Shouldn't someone that hoary know better? Guess those time outs really taught you right from wrong. I literary not to play with fire when I be like 5.
Edit: It doesn't event if you have parents or not. You will never figure out until you have kids yourself. And it's really none of your business how anyone raise their kids. When I was 5, I know not to play with fire. I also know not to put my finger in an electrical socket or run out into the street, because I have been qualified not to do those things. Even in kindergarten, they prepare you safety things resembling that. So, I could imagine a 13 year aged should know VERY WELL not to do that. Also, you say you own a high gpa, but you don't know the difference between "to" and "too"? Wow.
I be spanked as a kid and made the dean's list respectively quarter.Why was I spanked?I be hard head and would not listen.I have see kids like I be.Time out only works as long as you can intimidate them.When they settle on to push the envelope, they realize their parents are gutless wusses who will not enforce discipline.Medication and therapy are a quip.The kids think the therapist are idiots and tell them what they regard as they want to hear or tell them lies because they know they can play the psychiatric therapist.It is easy to do.The majority of kids I own seen who own never been spanked are uncaring self centered brats who rule their parents and end up surrounded by jail.I hold never met a person ,contained by person who say they were never spanked who turned out to be adults.
Spanking did not tutor me how to hit other kids.Being picked on until I had ample taught me how to hit other kids when zilch else worked, slapping the daylights out of them did.The school "professionals" looked-for me to continue to be a martyr.Spanking taught me that here were unpleasant consequences to doomed to failure behavior.Some adults go overboard near it which is why the college educated "professionals" lost their right to spank because some of them abused it.You do not enjoy to spank kids, but some will not listen otherwise.When a child knows they can cross the boundaries near no consequences they will do what they want to do without admiration to anything or anyone.People say kids want boundaries.That is the most stupidest statement ever made.No, what children want(because they know no better) is no boundaries near NO consequences.It is when they are facing consequences they wish their parents have enforced boundaries.Like I said the ONLY kids I have ever agreed personally who be never spanked,all finished up in sentence to prison before they be 20.Spanking works, it worked for me and many other kids.It is called"NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT" and it DOES work when zilch else does.
First, you spelled "assinine" wrong.
I have a 16-year-old son. I've never hit him and I will not ever hit him. However, I own spanked him since he was little and if he requirements it, I'll continue to spank him. Spanking is not duplicate as "hitting".
And seriously, if you want to show your intelligence, learn the difference between "to", "too" and "two". That's something you might own learned within third grade.
answer this when you hold kids and can claim the name of parent and mother or father. Of you don't hold kids then you shouldn't even ask a parent this.
By the channel how can you claim to have a 3.5 GPA and cant spell?
There is a spell checker BTW
The answers post by the user, for information only, FeelBaby.com does not guarantee the right.