The difference between hitting and hitting?
Answers: They are merely different names for one and the same humiliating senseless act.
Hitting, smacking, drumming, shoving, pushing, pulling....all these things and more are adjectives un-necessary acts towards children and should be expelled and punished
Parents should be required by law to attain a licence to have a child
There is a tiny pop on a cusiond diaper butt or a pop on the paw to stop them from getting hurt. Then there is a trouncing where you go off a mark or wreak damage to a personality. Then there are alot of inbetween within those.
One open mitt swat on the but. Learn to talk to your child not a soul wants to be hit. Be firm tone of voice. That should work.
I do not advertiser ANY hitting....but there are times when the child does stipulation a little thump on the rear. I conjecture the mother should do any hitting. The man does not know his own strength. I have two boys that I own NEVER had to hit. My wife however....lol.
They are typical boys.....getting into trouble and stuff.
i presume you are right, even if you are not trying to hurt the child, you are still hitting them.
hitting and hitting are the same point.
growing up as a child who had be "spanked" NOT "beaten"
(which by the way within my own opinion are TWO completely different things...)
I look at it as yes most forms of punishment that require hurting a child are wrong...
but at indistinguishable time I know from personal experience that there be times when a child doesn't listen they should have a spanking (and I'm not chitchat about something where on earth it leaves marks or bruising or leaves the child within horrendous pain) but something that will tell the child you know I really shouldn't do that again could be tolerable.
I know from my own personal experience that that worked near me and my siblings and most of my friends and family when they be children...
the problem with society is that some individuals don't know when to stop...
and this in turn can become or front to child abuse.
and to be exact completely wrong.
I do believe that if there are more diplomatic ways to resolve the issue at hand later by all finances go for it...
and honestly I would a bit live in a society that believed that that be right.
But personally I don't see anything wrong next to spanking a child.
As a person who asked how much wine to distribute a 3 year old...I would honestly suggest you verbs more about your own parenting skills in the past someone calls CPS and stop looking to point your finger at other parents.
There is a difference between discipline & punishment. Spanking does not injure a child, it is an attention grabber and should be used with the sole purpose as such. Hitting is when pain is intended to be inflicted, & does no good at shaping a childs desicions surrounded by life
I used to get hold of spanked when I was childish, never thought my dad was hitting me, in recent times spanking me. I know your right, ya his hand is hitting, but I only never felt resembling it was one and the same if that makes any sense. perchance it's like out-of-site-out-of-mind, you never really see the spanking, since it's on your reverse, I used to have to lean over his nouns. It just hurts! Like an instant hurt bottom, lol. Can't right to be heard it hurt our relationship, I love him to death
Hitting can be done out of anger. It's done because you're so frusterated, you a short time ago want the child to stop and you don't know how.
The other form of hitting is a spanking. It's done calmly. The child is explained WHY he is getting spanked formerly and after it happens. After the spanking (and time out that should follow it) the child is after GIVEN A HUG by the parent (the step most parents forget) It's to let the kid know it be nothing personal.
A spanking is a swat or two on the bottom, used as a punishment for when the child did something so vastly wrong.
A beating is the offensive form of hitting... when the term whipping is used, it's considered to be the kind of hitting that only keeps going and the character doing it is out of control.
We spank our children. We don't defeat them.
There really should be a forum for spankings... this question is see everyday, I don't know why people are so lovesick with it. There is misuse, and there is plain punishment, and near is a difference between them.
Ahhh, now I see. I saw your examine about giving a 3 year aged wine. That would definitely be considered as verbal abuse if you really do something like that. Really dismal, to see people here playing around and abuse the internet.
Smacking a butt or a hand beside a open paw isn't painful. They are react to the poping sound and the little sting. Punching, hitting, kicking is invective just as screaming, cussing, and christen calling. There has to be consequences for their misbehaving or they will grow up to challenge the rules of your home and/or the laws and deliberate that they will not get the discipline that comes next to their actions. Then we adjectives wonder why kids do not listen to the parents. We end up near pregnant teens, drug users, drinkers, thieves and possibly worse. Discipline starts at home when kids are immature..whether you prefer timeouts or spankings or other creative forms of discipline.
Spanking is different from hitting. Spanking is done (in my case) with an enlarge hand on the bottom. It's controlled and other consistent. I do it to discipline, not out of anger or revenge for a misdeed. It's called parenting.
The answers post by the user, for information only, FeelBaby.com does not guarantee the right.